I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
其中，e是电子所带的基本电荷，ε0是真空介电常数，h是约化普朗克常数，c是光速。，详情可参考heLLoword翻译官方下载
。关于这个话题，同城约会提供了深入分析
Минобороны ОАЭ сообщило об отражении ракетной атаки со стороны Ирана02:20
全年对外非金融类直接投资额10404亿元，比上年增长1.6%。其中，对共建“一带一路”国家非金融类直接投资额2834亿元，增长18.0%。（见表15），这一点在WPS下载最新地址中也有详细论述